24–28 Aug 2026
Kirchhoff Institute for Physics (KIP)
Europe/Berlin timezone

Contribution List

31 out of 31 displayed
Export to PDF
  1. 24/08/2026, 13:45
  2. Jan Kieseler (KIT)
    24/08/2026, 14:00
  3. Mario Krenn (University of Tübingen)
    24/08/2026, 14:45
  4. Ramon Winterhalder (University of Milan)
    25/08/2026, 09:00
  5. Lucie Flek (University of Bonn)
    25/08/2026, 09:45
  6. Dario Hügel (Barra Labs)
    25/08/2026, 14:00
  7. Nicole Hartman (TUM)
    25/08/2026, 14:45
  8. Adrian Oeftiger (Linacre College)
    25/08/2026, 16:00
  9. 25/08/2026, 16:45
  10. Luigi DelDebbio (University of Edinburgh)
    26/08/2026, 09:00
  11. Maximilian Dax (ELLIS Institute Tübingen)
    26/08/2026, 09:45
  12. 26/08/2026, 11:00
  13. Johann Brehmer (CuspAI)
    26/08/2026, 11:45
  14. Emille Ishida (Clermont Auvergne)
    27/08/2026, 09:00
  15. Tristan Bereau (University of Heidelberg)
    27/08/2026, 09:45
  16. Michelle Kuchera (Florida State University)
    27/08/2026, 16:30
  17. Roberto Trotta (SISSA)
    27/08/2026, 17:15
  18. 28/08/2026, 12:00
  19. Lorenzo Colantonio (Sapienza Università di Roma and INFN)

    In recent years, approaches inspired by fundamental physics have played an important role in the development of modern machine learning algorithms, from energy based models to diffusion processes. Motivated by this perspective, we propose a hybrid quantum-classical learning framework inspired by adiabatic quantum dynamics and quantum annealing for solving constraint satisfaction problems.In...

    Go to contribution page
  20. Shreya Saha (Adelaide University)
    Foundation Models

    The integration of foundation models in particle physics is gaining pace rapidly and has expanded the search for new physics. This talk presents foundation models trained on low-level data from the first fully simulated dataset using Open Data Detector (ColliderML), to distinguish between Standard Model and Beyond Standard Model processes. We compare new physics discovery using only low level...

    Go to contribution page
  21. Edoardo Murano (Sapienza Università di Roma and INFN)

    Partitioning a graph into communities is an NP-hard optimization problem with a natural statistical-physics formulation: the optimal partition is the ground state of an antiferromagnetic Potts model, with modularity playing the role of negative energy. Clustering on graph-structured data is a recurring task in fundamental physics, where detector and event data are naturally represented as...

    Go to contribution page
  22. Nathan Campioni (Sapienza Università di Roma and INFN)

    QSOpt (Quantum Sensing Optimization) is an end-to-end differentiable simulation and machine-learning optimization framework for open quantum networks composed of superconducting qubits, bosonic modes and input-output channels with user-defined interactions.
    The advancements in quantum technologies have sparked interest in employing quantum systems as sensors, with superconducting quantum...

    Go to contribution page
  23. Bao-Dong Sun (Ruhr-Universität Bochum)
    Simulations & Generative Models

    We apply score-based diffusion models to two-dimensional SU(2) lattice pure gauge theory with the Wilson action, extending recent work on U(1) gauge theories. The SU(2) manifold structure is handled through a quaternion parameterization. The model is trained on 10,000 configurations generated via Hybrid Monte Carlo at a fixed coupling $\beta_0= 2.0$ on an $8\times 8$ lattice, augmented to...

    Go to contribution page
  24. Antonin Vacheret (CNRS - LPC Caen)

    Neutrino oscillations encode fundamental information about neutrino masses and mixing parameters, offering a unique window into physics beyond the Standard Model. Estimating these parameters from oscillation probability maps is, however, computationally challenging due to the maps’ high dimensionality and nonlinear dependence on the underlying physics. Traditional inference methods, such as...

    Go to contribution page
  25. Fracesco Passante (Sapienza Università di Roma and INFN)

    Gauge equivariant convolutional neural networks have shown that enforcing exact lattice gauge symmetry in a neural network significantly improves regression accuracy on gauge invariant observables. However, their convolutional kernels stay fixed after training and cannot adapt to configuration-dependent features. We introduce GELT (Gauge Equivariant Lattice Transformer), a gauge equivariant...

    Go to contribution page
  26. Federica Di Bartolomeo (Sapienza Università di Roma)

    We present a hybrid graph-based Bayesian framework for uncertainty-aware inference of rare events on spatially embedded networks.
    Starting from a Multivariate Conditional Autoregressive Model (MCAR) in a hierarchical Bayesian architecture defined on the dual graph of a street network, events counts are described by Poisson likelihoods with structured graph effects, unstructured heterogeneity...

    Go to contribution page
  27. Guillaume Letellier (GREYC - University of Caen Normandy, France)
    Foundation Models

    Jet tagging at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) increasingly relies on deep learning models trained on massive simulated datasets, leading to high computational costs and limited robustness to detector mismodeling. We introduce JetParticle-JEPA (JP-JEPA), a self-supervised Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture that learns physically meaningful jet representations directly from continuous...

    Go to contribution page
  28. Iuliia Panteleeva
    Simulations & Generative Models

    Extracting hadronic form factors from sparse and noisy lattice QCD data typically relies on parametric ansätze, introducing model-dependence. We present a generative framework based on denoising diffusion models for parameterisation-independent reconstruction of these quantities. The generative prior is built from a large ensemble of synthetic curves drawn from distinct functional classes...

    Go to contribution page
  29. Gabriele Pignalberi (Sapienza Università di Roma and INFN)

    Many scientific datasets are fundamentally incomplete: only a biased subset of true positives is ever observed, while the remainder stay unlabeled. This Positive-Unlabeled (PU) setting arises whenever detection efficiency is imperfect and covariate-dependent—a structure shared across many fields in fundamental science. In hadron collider experiments, hardware triggers record only a biased...

    Go to contribution page